Bilingual Education: 5 Reasons it should be Required

By Matthew Lynch

This generation of K-12 students is growing up in a society that is increasingly bilingual.  While foreign language requirements have long been a core requirement for high school graduation—second language classes at an earlier age would improve overall fluency for most students.  It’s time to introduce second-language concepts to the youngest of K-12 students, and here are just a few of the reasons why:

1. Bilingual Children have an Academic Advantage.  Studies in language development show that when young children have more exposure to all languages at an early age, it actually gives them a distinct academic advantage throughout life. There is often an argument that students should first master the English language before branching out to others – but why can’t both be taught simultaneously? Bilingual children are able to focus more intently on the topics at hand and avoid distractions from academic pursuits. They are also able to demonstrate higher levels of cognitive flexibility, or the ability to change responses based on environment and circumstances.

2.  Bilingualism Improves Life-Long Learning Skills. For children to truly see the full potential multi-lingualism has on learning, exposure to non-native languages should actually begin long before Kindergarten.  However, even children who learn their first Spanish words at the age of 5 can benefit from dual language curriculum. Learning is learning. The more that children can take advantage of new concepts, the more in tune their brains will be to all learning throughout life. Some studies have also found that the aging of the brain is slower and the employment rate is higher in adults with bilingual capabilities. Why not set kids up for success and strengthen long-term brain health while we are at it?

3. It Helps to Remove International Language Barriers.  There are also the cultural benefits to children learning two languages together. The children who come from English-speaking homes can lend their language expertise to friends from Spanish-speaking homes, and vice versa. Contemporary communication technology has eliminated many global barriers when it comes to socialization and even doing business. It makes sense that language boundaries should also come down and with help from our K-12 education system, that is possible.

4.  It Leads to Collaborative Learning.  Dual language programs show students a broader world-view, whatever the native language of the student, and lead to greater opportunities for collaborative learning. We should not limit what children learn based on outdated principles masked in patriotism.

5. Early Bilingual Education Increases Fluency in Later Years. It generally takes 5–7 years to be proficient in a second language.  Second-generation Hispanic children raised in the United States usually learn to speak English very well by adulthood, even though three-quarters of their parents speak mostly Spanish and are not English proficient.  However only 23 percent of first-generation immigrants from Spanish-speaking countries—those that began learning later in life, say they speak English very well.  Pew Hispanic Center statistics have shown that 88 percent of the members of the second generation—those children that were introduced to English at an early age, described themselves as strong English speakers.  This phenomenon should apply to children who speak English as their first language as well.  In other words, U.S. students should be introduced to a second language at a young age in order to be fluent by adulthood.  In fact, I believe that all K-12 students should have Spanish and English fluency by graduation.

By implementing bilingual options even younger, K-12 students stand to benefit long-term – both academically and in life. There really should be no reason why these students are not introduced to a second language as early as Kindergarten.

What is your opinion on mandating bilingual education programs in the future?

Choose your Reaction!
  • I’m on the fence about mandating bilingual education because I do feel it should be a choice. However, I agree with what you said above and see all of the benefits of knowing two (or more) languages. If it does go into effect in our schools, I won’t be at all surprised.

  • Bilingual education should not be mandated. It should be an option that parents and students can elect to choose or pass on in place of another course that they would rather take. It is very likely students will continue to choose to take a foreign language — but it’s every individuals choice.

  • Why not? The plethora of benefits for our students and our country is endless. The five reasons you listed above are on par – why wouldn’t we require students learn another language and help them be more successful in school and break down the language barriers? If mandated, bilingual education would get my full support.

  • Pingback:Bilingual Education: 5 Reasons it should be Req...
  • Pingback:Bilingual Education: 5 Reasons it should be Req...
  • I 100% agree that schools should be required to go bilingual from K-12 I’m doing an essay on this and I chose this topic because I’ve been talking about it at home and I speak three languages English, Spanish and Latin while you might say that Latin isn’t a language my family has been speaking it for hundreds of years. anyway I fully support bilingual requirement

  • Pingback:5 Reasons Bilingual Education Should Be Required - Little Sponges
  • Pingback:Major Essay 4: Bilingual Education – Chi Lai ’s Blog
  • Pingback:Annotated Bibliography (Blog 10) – Gabby's
  • I didn’t know that when kids are exposed to multiple languages they end up having an academic advantage later on. My husband and I have been thinking about putting out daughter in a dual language immersion program when she starts school because it is something we always wish our parents had done for us. I think it would help her out in her life in general since she would be able to communicate with more people, but it’s also nice to know that it could help her academically too.

  • I completely agree with having a language immersion program and mandating that all children learn a second language. The older children could make a choice on what they learn, even if means switching from what they learned st a younger age. In Mexico, the children are required to learn English and they can pick another one in high school if they want. I feel that these kids are ahead of ones that don’t have to. Kids in the U.S. most likely will not pursue a second language unless encouraged to do so or mandated to.

    • I agree with you, @Barbi York because if children are the ones who have a choice to do it, they will end up not doing it at all. Students must learn a second language that will make their lives easier and open more doors for them in the future. When I was in middle school to high school, we were required to take a second language class, which was always Spanish. Thankfully I already knew Spanish because it’s my 1st language, so lessons were usually easy for me. I was still able to help out my friends that didn’t understand much Spanish as I do. Being required to learn another language is a good thing, so when you are looking for a job, people will look at you differently in the right way because you count as two people by knowing another language. You set yourself apart from other people that only know one language.

  • Pingback:Los Beneficios de los Programas Bilingües en los Estados Unidos – StMU History Media
  • Pingback:Why We Need a Bilingual Generation | Advancement Courses
  • Comments are closed.