Policy & Reform

K-12 Writing Standards: What Will it Take to Improve Them?

While global communication has grown and improved by leaps and bounds in the past two decades, the same cannot be said for K-12 writing skills. A new study released by Gary Troia at Michigan State University finds that K-12 writing standards are stagnant from a decade ago, along with student writing achievement. What’s more, Troia says that nearly 25 percent of K-12 students in the U.S. are not performing at a proficient writing level. He takes aim at the Common Core standards for writing and says that though some ideas are strong, others are still not asking enough of student writing.

Any U.S. K-12 educator, in any topic area, can certainly relate to Troia’s findings and surveys have found that employers also bemoan the writing deficiencies of their workforce. So if Common Core suggestions are not enough, what is needed to truly transform the writing landscape of K-12 classrooms and learners? Here’s what I think:

Earlier computer/keyboarding introduction

Troia touches on this point in his study when he says that most schools do not comprehensively address keyboarding until third grade. Many children are learning to type, or peck out letters, on a computer keyboard long before they are tracing letters in a Kindergarten workbook. Through keyboarding, children learn spelling and reading, as well as develop their memory skills. So why are schools waiting until the third grade to maximize on this facet of early composition and phonics? Basic handwriting and traditional ways of learning to write are important, but so is the technology that supports contemporary communication. Writing curriculum should include keyboarding and generally more screen instruction at a much earlier age to capitalize on the technology that can catapult U.S. students into a higher level of writing proficiency. The ideas are there – they just need to start earlier.

More interdisciplinary focus 

Writing is not an isolated school subject; it is a skill that permeates all topics of learning. Parents, teachers, students and administrators need to stop considering writing an area of strength or weakness (much in the way we gear students towards math/science pursuits or creative areas if the talent exists). Writing is a must-have skill in the global economy and one that will be needed in some capacity for every career. We can’t let students off the hook if writing is simply not their strong suit. Writing is a skill that anyone CAN master with enough practice and its practical applications need to be emphasized in every subject area.

Remedial intervention

College is not the place where students should receive remedial help on their writing. Stronger programs need to exist as young as pre-K to ensure that no child moves forward without a firm grasp of the writing skills required. Teachers need time and resources to intervene on an individual level. Of course parental help here is also a necessity but cannot be relied upon to ensure that all students have writing proficiency as graduates. Promoting students that lack grade-level writing skills in the hopes that they will catch up only furthers the problem down the road.

It’s time to put writing on the pedestal it deserves. It is the foundation of K-12 academic success and workplace achievement. If we put writing on the back burner, it has the potential to damage every other subject area and hold our students back from their true achievement in school and life beyond the K-12 and college years. Now is the time to make writing a priority, particularly if we expect this next generation of students to lead globally.

How do you think we can collectively improve K-12 student writing proficiency?

Home-schooling families oppose Common Core

Even though they are not required to follow them, home-schooling parents across the country are quickly becoming the loudest voices in the call to repeal Common Core Standards. These families oppose the standards based on principle and believe in the importance of decentralizing all educational pursuits. The charge is being led by groups like the American Principles Project, Home Schooling Without Common Core and the Home School Legal Defense Association.

Speaking to the Huffington Post, mom of three Megan King said that:

“All parents should be concerned about this. This is our children. To me, it’s not political.”

King herself decided to home school two of her sons because of the Common Core English and math standards in the public school. She went on to co-found Kansans Against Common Core. King believes that, among other things, the Common Core Standards are poorly designed and that they are heavy on memorization and information retention, while shallow on literature requirements (a sentiment most groups opposing Common Core Standards share).

In a more logistical sense, home schooling families could feel the brunt of Common Core requirements if they start to be incorporated in standardized tests, like the ACT and the College Board (the owner of the SAT). Kids who were not required to follow the rigor of the Common Core could be punished for that fact in the form of low test scores that result in college application rejections.

This is yet another example of how incredibly permeating the Common Core debate is for all types of U.S. education — and how it impacts even those who are not required to abide by it.

Why Are Kids and Teachers Missing So Much School?

Missing school is nothing new, but recently both students and teachers have been absent more frequently. It’s crucial that we identify the reasons behind these absences in order to address them effectively. Research has indicated numerous factors at play when it comes to the growing trend of missing school for both kids and teachers alike. This article will explore some possible causes behind this issue, along with potential solutions.

Health-related issues have long been a leading factor in school absences for children. Children are susceptible to common illnesses like colds and flu, which can easily spread among classmates. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has further exacerbated this issue, causing not only increased health concerns but also precautionary absences for students and educators alike. Schools must adapt to the new norm, ensuring a safe and healthy environment for both physical and mental well-being.

Another reason why kids may miss school is anxiety or bullying. Students who suffer from anxiety or are victims of bullying may dread attending school due to fear of encountering their tormentors or experiencing an unsettling situation. A supportive learning environment is essential in tackling anxiety and bullying among students. Initiating anti-bullying programs and promoting openness about mental health within the education system can be effective measures.

The quality of education has direct repercussions on attendance rates. If children do not find classes engaging or perceive that they aren’t learning anything significant, they are less likely to prioritize attending school consistently. To improve academic enthusiasm, schools must strive to develop a curriculum that caters to students’ diverse interests.

One should not overlook the socioeconomic factors that contribute to absenteeism either. Kids who come from low-income families may face difficulties such as inadequate access to healthcare, nutritional deficiencies, or having to work part-time jobs to support their households. Offering financial assistance programs or implementing free meal initiatives can help reduce the pressure on these students.

With regards to teachers, they may also experience absenteeism for various reasons. Job stress, burnout, or personal health problems can all influence their attendance. A possible solution is to offer better professional support that addresses these concerns and encourages job satisfaction. The introduction of improved professional development programs and access to mental health services could go a long way in addressing teacher absenteeism.

In conclusion, there are many factors at play when it comes to understanding why kids and teachers miss so much school these days. While some problems are more common than others, it’s essential for education systems to adapt and address them accordingly. Fostering a supportive learning environment where students and educators feel valued is crucial for promoting consistent attendance at school.

How Democrats, Republicans Differ Over K-12 education

Introduction

The United States has a diverse political landscape, and it is evident in the differing stances of Democrats and Republicans on various issues. One such critical topic that both parties weigh in on is K-12 education. This article will explore how the two parties differ over prekindergarten to 12th-grade education, focusing on funding, accountability, and school choice.

Funding

One of the core areas where Democrats and Republicans have contrasting views is funding for K-12 education. The Democratic Party advocates for greater investment in public education with increased federal support. They believe that equitable funding across schools is essential, regardless of family income or location, to ensure every student has access to quality education.

On the other hand, the Republican Party emphasizes local control over public schools and prefers circulating funds among states via block grants or vouchers. They believe that states should have more flexibility in allocating resources based on their individual needs without strict federal guidelines.

Accountability and Standardized Testing

When it comes to accountability and standardized testing, the two parties hold dissimilar opinions as well. Democrats support robust accountability measures to ensure that teachers are effectively helping students learn. They generally favor the use of standardized tests as part of an overall teacher evaluation process to improve the quality of education. However, some factions within the party argue that standardized testing can create too much emphasis on test scores rather than evaluation through other research-based methods.

In contrast, Republicans lean towards reducing federal interference in setting academic standards and testing policies. They argue that a one-size-fits-all approach does not work for all students and call for more state autonomy over determining teacher performance measurements and student assessments.

School Choice

The issue of school choice showcases yet another area where Democrats and Republicans differ significantly. Democrats typically support efforts to strengthen public schools while promoting access to quality education for all students regardless of race or socio-economic status. They are generally skeptical of voucher programs and advocate for improving struggling public schools rather than diverting funds to private or charter schools.

On the other hand, Republicans promote a free-market approach to K-12 education and support a variety of choices, such as vouchers, charter schools, and homeschooling. They argue that competition in the education sector will improve the overall quality by allowing families to pick the best schooling options for their children.

Conclusion

In essence, Democrats and Republicans differ significantly on key aspects of K-12 education. While Democrats emphasize increased federal support and funding, alongside strong accountability measures, Republicans prioritize state autonomy and school choice options. Understanding these differing perspectives is vital for anyone interested in the future of American education and its policymaking process.

How Conferencing for Assessment Benefits Students During Hybrid Learning

When it comes to assessment, it is essential to find a way to capture student work in an accurate and timely way. Conferencing for assessment offers educators the perfect solution- it allows for the immediate assessment of student work and the collection of data that can be used to improve the learning environment. In addition, conferencing for assessment can be used to assess student work in various modes, including online, face-to-face, and hybrid formats.

The benefits of conferencing for assessment are numerous and far-reaching. For example, it can help to improve the accuracy and timeliness of assessment by allowing for the assessment of student work in various modes. This can help to ensure that all students are assessed equally and that no student is left behind. In addition, conferencing for assessment can also help to improve the quality of assessment by allowing educators to capture data that can be used to improve the learning environment. This data can be used to track student progress and make changes to the curriculum based on the assessment results.

Overall, conferencing for assessment is an essential tool for educators looking to improve the accuracy and timeliness of assessment and quality of assessment. In addition, it is a great way to ensure that all students can participate in an assessment and get feedback on their work on time.

Ron DeSantis Is Running for President. What Will That Mean for Education

Ron DeSantis, the Republican governor of Florida, has recently been making headlines as a potential presidential candidate for the 2024 election. As education is a critical issue for many Americans, it’s worth taking a closer look at what a DeSantis presidency could mean for education in this country.

DeSantis has been praised by conservatives for his handling of education policy in Florida. He has championed school choice and expanded programs that offer vouchers or tax credits to families who want to send their children to private schools. He has also been a vocal opponent of critical race theory, which he calls a “racist ideology.”

If DeSantis were to become president, he would likely continue to push for these policies at the federal level. He would likely try to expand school choice programs and increase funding for charter schools. He might also try to eliminate the Department of Education, as many Republicans have called for in the past.

However, some education advocates are wary of DeSantis’s approach to education. They argue that expanding school choice programs could harm public schools, which would lose funding as more students leave for private schools. They also argue that school vouchers are often used by families who are already well-off, while low-income families and students with disabilities are left behind.

Furthermore, DeSantis’s opposition to critical race theory has sparked controversy. Some educators argue that he is trying to censor discussions about race and history in schools, which they believe are essential for building a more inclusive society.

Finally, DeSantis’s approach to education may not be popular with all Republicans. Some moderates within the party may disagree with his emphasis on private schools and school choice. They may see public education as a critical institution that needs to be supported, rather than undermined.

In conclusion, Ron DeSantis’s potential presidential candidacy raises many questions about what his education policies might look like. While some conservatives may praise his support for school choice and opposition to critical race theory, education advocates and moderates may be wary of his approach. Ultimately, it will be up to the American people to decide whether they want President DeSantis to lead the nation’s education policy.    

What are the Working Conditions for a Veterinarian?

Becoming a veterinarian is a rewarding and challenging career choice. Veterinarians are responsible for the health and well-being of animals, and their work takes place in various settings, from clinics to farms.

Veterinarians typically work long hours, sometimes up to 12 hours a day. They must remain on their feet for extended periods, which can lead to physical fatigue. Because of the unpredictable nature of their work, veterinarians may also be required to work nights and weekends.

The environment in which veterinarians work can vary greatly depending on their specialty and the setting. Veterinary clinics are typically well-lit, airy, and have clean, comfortable seating areas. Veterinarians who work on farms may be exposed to the elements, including extreme temperatures and humidity.

Veterinarians must know a variety of medical equipment, such as ultrasound machines, radiograph machines, and other diagnostic tools. They must also have a thorough understanding of anesthesia and surgery.

Veterinarians must also possess excellent interpersonal skills. They must be able to communicate with pet owners, colleagues, and other staff professionally and compassionately. The job of a veterinarian can be emotionally demanding, as well. Veterinarians must be able to remain calm and composed in stressful situations and be able to handle the grief of pet owners when their animals become ill or pass away.

Veterinarians must also be organized and detail-oriented. They must be able to keep accurate records and monitor patient care. Veterinarians are considered essential personnel and are expected to be available in emergencies. This can mean on-call shifts or working holidays.

In addition to the regular hours of work, veterinarians must also complete continuing education courses to stay up-to-date with advances in veterinary care.

Overall, the working conditions of a veterinarian can be demanding and unpredictable, but the rewards of helping to care for animals can make it extremely fulfilling.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964: Everything You Need to Know

In the month of June, 1963, President John F. Kennedy asked Congress for an all-inclusive civil rights bill. His move was induced by enormous resistance to desegregation and Medgar Evers’ murder. However, Kennedy was unable to get this bill passed in Congress. Following his assassination in November, President Johnson pressed hard with a stronger version of the bill. Thanks to the support of Clarence Mitchell and Roy Wilkins, the bill was finally passed on July 2, 1964, after the Senate witnessed one of the longest debates in its history.

The Civil Rights Act forbids discrimination on the basis of color, race, religion, national origin, or sex. Provisions of this Act forbade discrimination based on race and sex in hiring, promoting, and firing. This Act also prohibited discrimination in federally funded programs and public accommodations. It strengthened the desegregation of schools as well as the enforcement of voting rights too.

This Act is the country’s benchmark civil rights legislation, and it continues to resonate to date. Once the Act was passed, it put a stop to the application of “Jim Crow” laws, which had been upheld earlier by the Supreme Court in the Plessy v. Ferguson case (1896). In that case, the court decreed that racial segregation claimed to be “separate but equal” was legitimate. Congress ultimately expanded the Civil Rights Act to strengthen the enforcement of citizen’s fundamental civil rights.

Title IV of the Act prohibits discrimination in public schools based on color, race, religion, national origin, or sex. Public schools include secondary schools, elementary schools, and public universities and colleges. But it was a decade later when the legal framework for anti-discrimination laws concerning public school students was laid.

The Civil Rights Act (1964) also made school desegregation a much easier process. This forced schools to stop segregation because the consequence of not doing so would be to lose funding. This significantly reduced the number of segregated schools in the U.S. and established federal criteria that were used to evaluate schools to detect any form of segregation. Schools that were discovered to be in noncompliance were forced to participate in desegregation plans.

Although the Act was quite effective in reducing segregation, it did not change how the staff and students in formerly white-only schools felt about having African-American students in their schools. This has continued in many ways to this day, and though things are noticeably better, the effects of racism and segregation still linger.

Title I: Everything You Need to Know

This is the federal legislation that provides funds towards the improvement of the education of children from low-income backgrounds. Title I was created to help close academic gaps and ensure economically disadvantaged students get an equitable, fair, and high-quality education.

Title I isn’t the only federal funding stream. There are other ‘Title’ funds – from I-VII, the goals of which are to help students who have burdens that may obstruct their access to an equitable education. These burdens include homelessness, poverty, living in remote rural districts, living in state-run institutions, and those who’re still learning the English language. For students with disabilities, there’s a separate funding stream.

For schools in America, Title I is the biggest federal aid package. Though almost all of it goes to public schools, students opting for homeschooling or enrolled in private schools are also eligible. Title I began as part of the ESEA (Elementary and Secondary Education Act) of 1965 during President Johnson’s “War on Poverty.” Later, the bill was reauthorized as NCLB (No Child Left Behind) during the George W. Bush administration and then as the ESSA (Every Student Succeeds Act) during the Obama administration.

According to Title I, equitable funding isn’t just the responsibility of individual states. Rather, it’s the federal government’s responsibility too. Since low-income students in public schools are disadvantaged because they may not enjoy all the educational benefits their peers from higher-income families have, Title I funding aims to provide them with equitable education. 

The intention is that with the extra support such additional funding will bring, these can meet high academic standards as required by federal law. However, the actual amount of Title I money that schools for low-income students get is minimal, almost 5% of annual per-pupil spending, though it differs based on geography.

To find which students belong to the low-income groups, the federal government gives schools the following five options, where schools can utilize the:

·         number of school-age children categorized as “low-income” in the latest census;

·         number of children who are eligible for reduced and free lunch under the National School Lunch Program;

·         number of children who get Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF);

·         number of children entitled to Medicaid; or

·         Community Eligibility Provision.

At present, over 50% of all school students in America receive Title I funds. This is almost 25 million students in about 60% of public schools in America.

Predicting the Future of Critical Race Theory

Critical Race Theory (CRT) is a framework that aims at analyzing the role of race and racism in society. It recognizes that racism is not just a product of individual prejudice but rather embedded in the structures and systems of society. It highlights the intersections of race, class, gender, and other social categories that shape inequality in society.

While CRT has been around since the 1970s, it has only recently gained mainstream attention. In 2020, the death of George Floyd sparked a global movement against racial injustice. CRT became a central part of the conversation around racial inequality, with many arguing that it offers a necessary perspective to understand the root causes of systemic racism.

However, CRT has also faced opposition from conservative politicians and commentators who argue that it divides people along racial lines and promotes a victim mentality. Several states in the US have banned or proposed to ban the teaching of CRT in schools, leading to a heated debate about academic freedom and the role of education in addressing social issues.

So, what does the future hold for CRT? There are several possible scenarios:

Scenario 1: CRT continues to gain momentum and becomes an established field of study in academia. In this scenario, CRT is recognized as an essential tool for understanding the complexities of race and racism in society. It continues to be taught in universities and integrated into policy-making and advocacy work. CRT has become a mainstream term in public discourse and helps to drive meaningful change in addressing systemic racism.

Scenario 2: CRT is pushed underground and becomes an unofficial or covert field of study. In this scenario, the bans on teaching CRT in schools and government institutions force CRT scholars to find alternative ways to disseminate their work. The field moves to private institutions or underground movements, making it harder to access for those outside these circles. While CRT still exists, it becomes less visible and accessible to the general public, limiting its potential to create change.

Scenario 3: CRT is dismissed as a passing trend and fades from public discourse. In this scenario, CRT is seen as just another fad or buzzword that captured attention for a moment but ultimately lacks the substance to effect real change. The opposition to CRT wins, and it falls out of favor in academic circles and policymaking. This scenario would effectively end the discussion of systemic racism and limit progress in addressing the issue.

Overall, the future of CRT is uncertain. Its fate depends on a complex interplay of political, social, and academic forces. However, what is clear is the need for honest and thoughtful discussions about race and racism in society. Whether CRT remains a guiding framework for understanding these issues or not, we must continue to engage with these conversations and work towards a more just and equitable society.