How Much Do Substitute Teachers Make in Each State?

Introduction

Substitute teachers play a vital yet often overlooked role in America’s education system. Stepping into classrooms on short notice, they maintain educational continuity when regular teachers are absent, handling everything from following established lesson plans to managing unfamiliar classrooms. Despite their importance, substitute teacher compensation varies dramatically across the United States, influenced by factors ranging from state policies to local district budgets and qualification requirements.

This comprehensive analysis examines substitute teacher pay across all 50 states, exploring not only the base compensation but also the complex factors that affect these rates. From the highest-paying states like Wisconsin and Connecticut to those with more modest compensation packages, this article provides a detailed look at the financial realities facing substitute educators nationwide.

Whether you’re considering substitute teaching as a career path, currently working as a substitute, or simply interested in understanding this critical component of our education infrastructure, this analysis offers valuable insights into the current state of substitute teacher compensation in America.

National Overview of Substitute Teacher Compensation

Current National Averages

According to the most recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), the national average wage for short-term substitute teachers is $20.95 per hour or approximately $43,570 annually for full-time equivalent work. However, this figure can be somewhat misleading since most substitute teaching positions are part-time or irregular, with many substitutes working significantly fewer than 2,080 hours (the full-time equivalent) per year.

When examining actual earnings rather than full-time equivalents, the national average substitute teacher salary is closer to $32,904 per year, with a typical hourly rate of $15.82. Most substitute teachers are paid a daily rate rather than an hourly wage, with these daily rates typically ranging from $90 to $200 depending on location, qualifications, and assignment type.

Short-Term vs. Long-Term Substitute Positions

The compensation structure for substitute teachers varies significantly between short-term and long-term assignments:

Short-Term Substitute Teaching

  • Typically involves day-to-day assignments
  • Usually paid a fixed daily rate
  • Generally does not include benefits
  • Doesn’t require extensive lesson planning or grading

Long-Term Substitute Teaching

  • Involves extended assignments (often weeks or months)
  • May be paid at a higher daily rate or receive a prorated teacher’s salary
  • May include some benefits (depending on district policies)
  • Often requires more extensive responsibilities including lesson planning, grading, and parent communication
  • In some districts, long-term substitutes can earn up to $25,000 more annually than day-to-day substitutes

In New York City, for example, long-term substitutes should earn approximately $100 more per day than daily substitutes (around $300 vs. $200), though investigations have revealed that many long-term substitutes are misclassified and underpaid.

Highest-Paying States for Substitute Teachers

According to the most recent Bureau of Labor Statistics data, the following states offer the highest average annual wages for short-term substitute teachers:

  1. Wisconsin: $69,730 ($33.52 per hour)
  2. Connecticut: $62,510 ($30.05 per hour)
  3. Oregon: $59,240 ($28.48 per hour)
  4. California: $56,240 ($27.04 per hour)
  5. North Dakota: $52,180 ($25.09 per hour)

It’s worth noting that the BLS calculates these annual figures based on full-time equivalent hours (2,080 hours per year), which many substitute teachers do not work. Therefore, actual annual earnings may be lower for most substitutes in these states.

Analysis of High-Paying States

Several factors contribute to the higher substitute teacher pay in these states:

  • Strong teacher unions and collective bargaining: Wisconsin, Connecticut, and California have historically strong teacher unions that advocate for better compensation.
  • Higher education funding overall: These states tend to invest more in education as a percentage of their state budgets.
  • Higher cost of living: California, Connecticut, and Oregon have relatively high costs of living, which partially explains their higher nominal wages.
  • Teacher shortages: Some districts have increased substitute pay rates to attract qualified candidates during teacher shortages.
  • Education requirements: States with higher compensation often have more stringent qualification requirements for substitute teachers.

Lowest-Paying States for Substitute Teachers

According to various data sources, the following states have the lowest average annual wages for substitute teachers:

  1. South Carolina: $21,742
  2. Maryland: $23,734
  3. Delaware: $23,925
  4. Ohio: $24,050
  5. Oklahoma: $24,240

Other low-paying states include Texas ($32,460) and North Carolina ($32,740) according to BLS data.

Challenges in Low-Paying States

Substitute teachers in lower-paying states face several challenges:

  • Financial insecurity: With daily rates sometimes as low as $60-$85, substitutes may struggle to make ends meet.
  • Lack of benefits: Most substitutes in these states receive no health insurance, paid time off, or retirement benefits.
  • Qualification barriers: Some states require college degrees or other certifications despite offering low compensation.
  • Employment instability: Work availability can be inconsistent, leading to unpredictable income.
  • Limited professional development: Few resources are available for professional growth.

Complete State-by-State Breakdown

The following table provides substitute teacher compensation data for all 50 states, based on the most current available information. It’s important to note that these figures represent averages across each state, and actual pay rates can vary significantly between districts within the same state.

State Hourly Mean Wage Annual Mean Wage Average Daily Rate Notes
Alabama $30,559 $110-130 Rates vary by district
Alaska $34.43 $71,620* $140-175 Highest pay in nonmetropolitan areas
Arizona $33,237 $120-160 Bachelor’s degree required
Arkansas $24,573 $90-110 Varies by district
California $27.04 $56,240 $140-200+ Higher in urban districts
Colorado $29,459 $100-150 Varies by district
Connecticut $30.05 $62,510 $140-180 Among highest paying states
Delaware $23,925 $90-110 Lower than national average
Florida $90-125 Varies widely by district
Georgia $100-130 Requirements vary by district
Hawaii $33,312 $160-180 Higher cost of living
Idaho $28,817 $90-110 Rural districts may pay less
Illinois $26,722 $110-140 Chicago rates higher than state average
Indiana $85-120 Varies by district
Iowa $30,148 $130-150 Relatively stable rates
Kansas $16.57 $34,460 $100-120 High concentration of jobs
Kentucky $90-120 Varies by district
Louisiana $25,769 $90-110 Lower than national average
Maine $28,985 $100-125 Varies by district
Maryland $23,734 $90-120 Among lowest paying states
Massachusetts $26,901 $100-150 Higher in Boston area
Michigan $30,022 $90-125 Varies significantly by district
Minnesota $29,843 $110-150 Higher in Minneapolis area
Mississippi $85-100 Among lowest daily rates
Missouri $24,960 $90-120 Varies by certification
Montana $27,883 $95-115 Rural districts may pay less
Nebraska $29,209 $100-140 Varies by district
Nevada $31,047 $100-150 Higher rates in Clark County
New Hampshire $25,742 $90-110 Varies by district
New Jersey $27,045 $100-130 Higher in northern districts
New Mexico $30,732 $110-130 Recent increases in some districts
New York $22.92 $47,680 $100-200 NYC rates higher than state average
North Carolina $15.74 $32,740 $80-110 Varies by certification
North Dakota $25.09 $52,180 $120-150 Among highest paying states
Ohio $24,050 $90-120 Varies by district
Oklahoma $24,240 $85-110 Among lowest paying states
Oregon $28.48 $59,240 $130-180 Among highest paying states
Pennsylvania $27,108 $90-125 Higher in Philadelphia area
Rhode Island $25,309 $90-120 Varies by district
South Carolina $21,742 $80-100 Lowest average state salary
South Dakota $29,057 $100-120 Varies by district
Tennessee $25,690 $85-110 Varies by district
Texas $15.61 $32,460 $80-130 Higher in urban districts
Utah $29,252 $100-130 Varies by district
Vermont $18.19 $37,840 $100-130 High concentration of jobs
Virginia $19.33 $40,200 $90-120 Higher in northern Virginia
Washington $38,025 $130-180 Higher in Seattle area
West Virginia $24.72 $51,420 $100-140 High concentration of jobs
Wisconsin $33.52 $69,730 $140-200 Highest paying state for substitutes
Wyoming $16.72 $34,770 $100-130 High concentration of jobs

Sources: Bureau of Labor Statistics (2023), Zippia (2024), and HelloSubs (2024)

*Note: The Alaska nonmetropolitan area shows the highest wage ($71,620), though statewide data is incomplete.

Factors Affecting Substitute Teacher Pay

Education and Certification Requirements

Substitute teacher qualifications vary significantly by state, affecting pay rates:

  • Bachelor’s degree requirements: 19 states require a bachelor’s degree for substitute teaching, though many offer waivers or alternatives. States include Arizona, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin, plus D.C.
  • High school diploma only: 6 states specifically only require a high school diploma or equivalent: Alabama, Colorado, New Mexico, Utah, Vermont, and Virginia.
  • Tiered pay systems: Many districts offer higher pay rates for substitutes with higher education levels. For example, in Colorado, those with a bachelor’s degree earn approximately $15.50 per hour, while those without earn around $13.50 per hour.
  • Certification bonuses: Some districts pay more for substitutes who hold teaching certificates or are working toward certification.

Geographic Factors

Substitute teacher pay varies not only between states but also within states:

  • Urban vs. rural disparities: Urban areas typically offer higher daily rates than rural districts. For example, in the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward metro area, substitutes earn an average of $65,870 annually, significantly higher than the California state average of $56,240.
  • Cost of living adjustments: Higher-paying states often have higher costs of living, which can offset some of the apparent wage advantages.
  • Regional economic factors: Local tax bases and funding priorities affect education budgets and, consequently, substitute teacher pay.

Length of Assignment

The duration of a substitute teaching assignment significantly impacts compensation:

  • Daily assignments: Typically paid at the base rate, which can range from as low as $60 to over $200 per day depending on the location.
  • Long-term assignments: Often paid at a higher rate, sometimes approaching the prorated salary of a full-time teacher, particularly after a certain number of consecutive days (often 10-20 days).
  • Permanent substitutes: Some districts hire permanent substitutes who work every day and may receive benefits and higher pay than day-to-day substitutes.

District Budgets and Policies

Local school district budgets and policies significantly influence substitute teacher compensation:

  • Budget constraints: Districts with limited funding may offer lower pay rates regardless of regional averages.
  • Collective bargaining: Districts with strong teacher unions may negotiate better substitute teacher pay and conditions.
  • Recruitment challenges: Districts facing substitute shortages may increase pay rates to attract qualified candidates.

Benefits and Challenges for Substitute Teachers

Common Benefits

While benefits for substitute teachers are generally limited compared to full-time teachers, some potential benefits include:

  • Flexibility: Most substitute teachers can choose when and where they work, allowing for work-life balance.
  • Professional development: Some districts offer training opportunities for substitutes.
  • Pathway to full-time teaching: Substitute teaching can provide valuable classroom experience and connections for those seeking permanent teaching positions.
  • Health insurance options: Some districts offer limited health insurance to substitutes who work a minimum number of days.
  • Retirement contributions: A few states allow long-term substitutes to participate in teacher retirement systems.

Financial Challenges

Substitute teachers face numerous financial challenges:

  • Income instability: Work availability can be unpredictable, leading to inconsistent income.
  • Lack of summer pay: Unlike some full-time teachers who can opt for 12-month pay distribution, substitutes typically receive no income during school breaks.
  • Few benefits: Most substitutes receive no health insurance, paid time off, or retirement benefits.
  • Professional expenses: Substitutes often pay for their own background checks, certifications, and classroom supplies.
  • Limited advancement opportunities: Pay increases are typically minimal without obtaining full teaching certification.

In a recent survey, economic anxiety was cited as a major reason why substitute teachers leave the profession, with many turning to more stable employment options.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Substitute Teaching

Changes in Demand and Pay

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted substitute teaching across the country:

  • Increased demand: Teacher absences increased due to illness, quarantine requirements, and burnout, creating higher demand for substitutes.
  • Decreased supply: Many substitutes, particularly older ones who formed a significant portion of the substitute workforce, left the profession due to health concerns.
  • Pay incentives: Some districts implemented temporary pay increases to attract substitutes during critical shortages, with daily rates increasing by $50-100 in some areas.
  • Fill rate challenges: Despite higher pay in many districts, fill rates (the percentage of teacher absences covered by substitutes) declined. According to a 2023 report, fill rates were down more than 10% compared to 2020 levels.

Current Recovery Status

As schools have returned to normal operations, the substitute teaching landscape continues to evolve:

  • Persistent shortages: Despite schools returning to full capacity, many districts still struggle to fill all teacher absences with qualified substitutes.
  • Changing demographics: The substitute teacher pool has shifted, with fewer retirees and more younger individuals entering the profession.
  • New expectations: Many substitutes report higher expectations including technological proficiency, hybrid teaching skills, and additional classroom management challenges.
  • Compensation adjustments: Some temporary pay increases implemented during the height of the pandemic have become permanent in districts still facing shortages.

Strategies for Maximizing Earnings as a Substitute Teacher

Qualification Enhancements

Substitute teachers can potentially increase their earnings through the following strategies:

  • Obtain higher education credentials: Districts often pay more for substitutes with bachelor’s degrees or teaching certificates.
  • Pursue specific certifications: Specializations in high-need areas like special education or STEM subjects can command higher pay rates.
  • Gain relevant experience: Prior teaching or childcare experience can qualify substitutes for higher pay tiers in some districts.
  • Develop specialized skills: Proficiency in areas like educational technology or language skills can lead to premium assignments.

Strategic Work Approaches

Beyond qualifications, certain work strategies can maximize substitute teaching income:

  • Pursue long-term assignments: These typically pay more and offer more stable income.
  • Work in multiple districts: This increases work opportunities and allows substitutes to compare and choose higher-paying options.
  • Build strong relationships with schools: Becoming a preferred substitute at specific schools can lead to more consistent work.
  • Consider urban or high-need schools: These often offer higher pay rates due to greater difficulty filling positions.
  • Supplement with tutoring: Many substitutes increase their income by offering private tutoring services.

The Future of Substitute Teacher Compensation

Emerging Trends

Several trends are shaping the future of substitute teacher compensation:

  • Rising minimum requirements: More states are implementing stricter qualification standards for substitutes, which may eventually lead to higher pay.
  • Technology integration: Some districts are implementing electronic substitute placement systems that can include incentives for high-demand assignments.
  • Alternative staffing models: Companies like Kelly Education and EduStaff are partnering with districts to provide substitute staffing services, sometimes offering benefits not typically available to district-hired substitutes.
  • Permanent substitute positions: More districts are creating permanent building substitute positions that offer stable hours and sometimes include benefits.

Policy Considerations

Policy changes that could impact substitute teacher compensation include:

  • Statewide minimum pay standards: Some states are considering establishing minimum daily rates for substitute teachers.
  • Benefit eligibility expansions: Policies to extend health insurance and retirement benefits to substitutes who work a minimum number of days.
  • Professional development requirements and stipends: Increased training requirements paired with compensation for completed professional development.
  • Integration with teacher pipeline initiatives: Using substitute teaching as a formalized pathway to full certification, with corresponding pay increases.

Conclusion

The landscape of substitute teacher compensation across the United States reveals significant disparities, with hourly wages ranging from less than $16 in states like Texas to over $33 in Wisconsin. These variations reflect not only differences in state education funding and policies but also local economic conditions, qualification requirements, and the perceived value of substitute teaching within educational systems.

While some states and districts offer competitive compensation that approaches that of full-time teachers, many substitute teachers face financial challenges including inconsistent work availability, lack of benefits, and low daily rates. These challenges have contributed to ongoing substitute shortages in many regions, which the COVID-19 pandemic has only exacerbated.

For those considering substitute teaching, understanding the compensation structure in your state and local districts is essential for making informed career decisions. Strategic approaches such as pursuing long-term assignments, obtaining additional qualifications, and working in higher-paying districts can help maximize earnings in this field.

As education systems continue to grapple with teacher shortages and increased absences, the importance of qualified substitute teachers has never been more apparent. This growing recognition may eventually lead to improved compensation and working conditions, particularly if educational stakeholders acknowledge the vital role that substitute teachers play in maintaining educational continuity and quality.

The data presented in this analysis provides a comprehensive snapshot of substitute teacher compensation across the United States as of 2024, offering valuable insights for current and prospective substitute teachers, educational administrators, and policymakers working to address the challenges in this critical component of our education system.

Choose your Reaction!